Tag Archives: Word of God

Proven Trustworthy

13 Monday Nov 2023

Posted by in Studies, Whole Armor of God

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Welcome Everyone to a new week and a new post on Renaissance Woman!

I am still in the midst of my study on The Whole Armor of God (Ephesians 6:10-18a) and am looking specifically at the Shield of Faith. 

What is faith?  I have to admit I was astonished at the definition for faith found in the New World Dictionary.  The entry for faith begins with “confidence, belief, to trust, to urge, be convinced, to persuade, a compact” but then comes #1: “unquestioning belief that does not require proof or evidence”.  This is followed up by #2: “unquestioning belief in God, religious tenets, etc.”

Far be it from me to disagree with the example of scholarship that is a dictionary, but I do.  These two entries are not at all what is meant by the Biblical description of faith.  Consider first the relating of the Syrophoenician/Canaanite woman coming to Jesus as related in Matthew 15:21-28 and Mark 7:24-30.

Jesus and His disciples have gone to the region of Tyre and Sidon and here they are approached by a woman who cries out to Jesus asking Him to heal her daughter who is severely demon possessed.  Jesus does not answer her but does say to His disciples “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of Israel.”  When the woman continues to cry out for His help, He does say to her, “It is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the little dogs.”  The woman answers Him, “Yes, Lord, yet even the little dogs eat the crumbs which fall from their master’s table.”  Matthew records Jesus’ reply as “O woman, great is your faith!  Let it be to you as you desire.”

Let us next consider the story of the Centurion also related in Matthew’s gospel as well as in Luke.  Jesus enters Capernaum and a centurion comes to Him asking Him to heal his servant who was sick and near death.  Jesus answers, “I will come and heal him.”  The centurion says, “Lord, I am not worthy that You should come under my roof.  But only speak a word, and my servant will be healed.  For I also am a man under authority, having soldiers under me.  And I say to this one ‘Go,’ and he goes; and to another ‘Come,’ and he comes; and to my servant ‘Do this,’ and he does it.”  Jesus marvels and says, “Assuredly I say to you, I have not found such great faith, not even in Israel!” (See Matthew 8:5-13, Luke 7:1-10).  

Matthew 9:20-22 and Mark 5:25-34 also records the story of the woman with the flow of blood for twelve years.  She manages to get close to Jesus and touches the hem of His garment because she believed that, “If only I may touch His garment, I shall be made well.” Jesus says to her; “your faith has made you well.”

The Greek word used in each of these passages is pistis (G4102).  The Strong’s defines pistis as “persuasion, i.e. credence; conviction (of religious truth or the truthfulness of God or a religious teacher) especially reliance upon Christ for salvation; constancy in such profession, by extension the system of religious (Gospel) truth itself-assurance, belief, believe, faith, fidelity.”  Pistis is related to peitho (G382) which is a primary root meaning “to convince-by argument true or false, to pacify or conciliate, to assent (to evidence or authority)…” 

As I read through the entry for “faith” in the Dictionary of New Testament Theology, I found no basis for the dictionary definition.  The very word “persuasion” infers the one being persuaded is at the very least indifferent to the persuader’s argument and, at the most, hostile to it.  I cannot imagine there would not be questions asked before persuading and convincing would take place.

Pistis is a covenant word.  The word group (pistis, pisteuo, pistos, pistoo) originally denoted conduct that honored an agreement or bond (Brown, 594).  While there are certain parts of the world where the seriousness of entering into an agreement or bond is understood, it is less so here in the Western World.  Here, we think nothing of breaking bonds if it suits us to do so whereas breaking a bond-especially a covenant bond-used to mean death.  I cannot imagine two parties entering into such a bond without having strong evidence both parties were trustworthy and reliable. 

I don’t see that any of these Gospel accounts can be considered unquestioning or without evidence.  Word of Jesus’ works had spread through the region so there were plenty of accounts to convince these three of His willingness to heal.  The evidence that He was not only willing but able was walking about on two legs.  What astounds me is the fact that two out of three of these stories involve non-Jews.  The fact that a Canaanite (Luke says Greek or Syrophoenician) and a Roman approached Jesus described a level of persuasion and convincing I don’t have words for.

Perhaps the Canaanite woman was not quite despised by the Jews.  Gentiles had their own court in the temple so they could worship the True God but they were not allowed to worship with God’s Chosen People.  She was more acceptable than a Roman.  The oppressor.  An enemy of God Himself.  And these are two people whose faith is recorded in the Gospels.  Again, I can see nothing in these accounts to suggest these two made an unquestioning or evidence-less decision to act against culture, nationality, and extreme prejudice and ask Jesus for help.

The Bible does not require unquestioning trust or belief in the face of a lack of evidence.  1 Peter 3:15 tells us to expect questions: “…always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you…”  The passage in Paul’s letter to the Thessalonians so resonates with me I have it as the tagline for this blog: “Test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21).

As I dig further down into the dictionary definition of faith, I find entries I can agree with: “5. complete trust, confidence, or reliance, 6. allegiance to some person or thing, loyalty”.  My faith is not at all unquestioning.  If you’ve been reading my blog for some time, you know how true that is.  Our God answers me.  Sometimes it takes time to get an answer to the exact question I asked but years of walking with Him has proved that He couldn’t answer the question at the time I asked it.  There were other answers to related questions needed before I could even understand His answer to what I asked.  He’s never not answered me.

Our God is relationship.  He is the Covenant God and does not require us to give our lives to Him in unquestioning loyalty. (Not even the Mosaic Covenant had such a requirement: see Exodus 24:3).  Cults demand unquestioning loyalty.  The Word of our God was made flesh in Jesus.  Those of us living now who have never seen Jesus in His flesh are not in a worse off position than the people of that day.  We have something far better.  We have the Spirit of the Living God living in us convincing, persuading, comforting, teaching, and answering. 

Of course, I can’t convince you.  I can only promise you Our God is safe to question but you will have to discover that for yourself.  Do it!  Ask Him a question.  Any question.  See how He answers you.  Test His answer.  The Bible is an excellent litmus test for trusting the answers received are indeed from God.  No answer will contradict His revelation of Himself.  It will contradict the interpretation of Him you’ve received so be prepared to spend some time with Him.  He loves you.  He gave Himself for you.  You can trust Him.

Unless noted otherwise, all Scriptures are quoted from The Holy Bible, New King James Version, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee, 1982

References  

Court of the Gentiles – Bible History (bible-history.com)

Brown, Colin, The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Volume I, Regency Reference Library, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1967, 1986

Guralnik, David B., Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, William Collins + World Publishing Co., Inc., Cleveland • New York, 1953, 1976

Strong, James, LL.D., S.T.D., The New Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee, 1990

Ending in Death

18 Monday Sep 2023

Posted by in Studies, Whole Armor of God

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , , ,

Hello Readers!  Welcome-or welcome back-to Renaissance Woman.

This week is a continuation of my study of the Whole Armor of God as described by the Apostle Paul in his Epistle to the Ephesians.  My study passage is Ephesians 6:10-18a.  For those of you who have been following along with all of my posts on this passage, you are well aware I have not made great inroads on this study.  I am, in fact, still looking at the words “take”.  Paul says to “take up the whole armor of God” in verse 13, “take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the spirit” in verse 17, and says also “above all, taking the shield of faith” in verse 16.

“Take” in verses 13 and 16 are translated from the same word analambano.  The tenses are different but the words are the same.  “Take” in verse 17 is translated from the Greek dechomai.  The definitions of these two words aren’t all that different.  The Greek-English Lexicon (BDAG) defines analambano as “to lift up, carry away, take up, to take up in order to carry, to make something someone’s own by taking, with a focus on moral or transcendent aspects, to take to one’s self, adopt, take someone along on a journey, to take something up for scrutiny, take in hand” whereas dechomai is defined as, “to receive something offered or transmitted by another, to take something in hand, to be receptive of someone, to overcome obstacles in being receptive, to indicate approval or conviction by accepting” (BDAG, 66, 221-222). 

The two phrases that caught my attention are “to make something someone’s own…to take to one’s self” and “to indicate approval or conviction by accepting.”  What does it mean that two different words were used in this passage?  Is this passage saying we take the whole armor of God to ourselves and make it our own but then merely receive, or take hold of, the helmet of salvation and the sword of the spirit?  Don’t we make salvation our own?  Since the Holy Spirit lives in us, don’t we also make the sword of the spirit our own?

As I meditated on the meanings of these two different Greek words I found the short is answer is “yes”.  A more descriptive answer is; since the whole armor of God is Jesus Christ, every piece ought to be considered part of the whole with no part considered greater or lesser than another.  As Jesus fully gives Himself to us, nothing lacking; so then does every part of the armor which He is become ours without limit.  And yet, I cannot deny the helmet of salvation and sword of the spirit are “taken up” dechomai rather than “taken up” analambano.  Can something be learned by considering these two different words and their usage in this passage?  Again, the short answer is “yes”!

I have been reading Andrew Murray’s With Christ in the School of Prayer and, just this last week, I read: “The whole of salvation is Christ Himself: He has given Himself to us.  He Himself lives in us…We participate, not only in the benefits of HIS work, but in the work itself.  This is because we are His Body.  The Head and the members are one: “The head cannot say to the feet, I have no need of thee” (1 Corinthians 12:21).  We share with Jesus everything He is and has. “The glory which Thou gavest me, I have given them” (John 17:22).  We are partakers of His life, His righteousness, and His work.”  (Murray, 115-116). 

This quote is taken from Andrew Murray’s Chapter Titled “Christ the Intercessor” and the entire chapter reiterated to me that I ought not to think of the helmet of salvation and sword of the spirit as something separate from the armor and shield: it’s all Christ.  The difference in Greek words was not suggesting to me that the helmet and sword were something I could receive but could not adopt as my own.  I think the difference in the Greek words are a warning and that warning is found in the portion of dechomai’s definition which says, “to indicate approval or conviction by accepting.”

I was reminded of something I had read in William Gurnall’s The Christian in Complete Armor.  He writes, “The Christian’s armour which he wears must be of divine institution and appointment.  The soldier comes into the field with no arms but what his general commands.  It is not left to every one’s fancy to bring what weapons he please; this will breed confusion.  The Christian soldier is bound up to God’s order; though the army be on earth, yet the council of war sits in heaven; this duty ye shall do; these means ye shall use.  And [those who] do more, or use other, than God commands, though with some seeming success against sin, shall surely be called to account for this boldness.  The discipline of war among men is strict in this case.  Some have suffered death by a council of war even when they have beaten the enemy, because out of their place, or beside their order.  God is very precise in this point; he will say to such as invent ways to worship him of their own, coin means to mortify corruption, obtain comfort in their own mint; ‘Who hath required this at your hands?’” (Gurnall, 50).

On the armor of God must be of God in constitution, Mr. Gurnall has this to say: “The Christian’s armour must be armour of God in regard of its make and constitution.  My meaning is, it is not only that God must appoint the weapons and arms the Christian useth for his defence: but he must also be the efficient of them, he must work all their work in them and for them.” (Gurnall, 54).

The Chapter in Andrew Murray’s book opened with this: “All growth in the spiritual life is connected with clearer insight into what Jesus is to us.  The more I realize that Christ must be everything to me and in me, that everything in Christ is indeed for me, the more I learn to live the real life of faith.  This life dies to self and lives wholly in Christ.  The Christian life is no longer a vain struggle to live right, but a resting in Christ to find strength in Him as life.  He helps us fight and gain the victory of faith!” (Murray, 115).

Proverbs 14:12 says, “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death.”  This is what I see in the difference between the two Greek words used in my study passage.  It’s all Christ.  There is nothing of Himself He holds back from us but He is THE WAY.  Jesus Christ is salvation.  I think it’s significant that Paul says “the helmet of salvation”.  I plan to take some time with this later in the series so will only say now that, the helmet does not only serve to keep our thoughts safe from the wiles of devil.  We have the mind of Christ but are admonished by Paul to “let this mind be in you which was also in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 2:5).  Our thoughts ought to be His thoughts.  We ought to be thinking about salvation the same way He thinks about salvation.

The sword of the spirit, which is the word of God, is ours to wield.  The Greek for “word” in this passage is rhema (G4487) and means “utterance.”  We are to live on every word that comes from the mouth of God (Matthew 4:4).  God did not stop speaking at some point in the past.  We are not stuck with the books that have been collected into that which we call The Bible.  No, we can hear God’s words for ourselves at any moment.  His Spirit lives within us and He guides us into all truth for “He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak” (John 16:13, emphasis mine). 

We indicate our approval and conviction by accepting His helmet of salvation and the sword of the spirit.  When we go about our daily lives, we do so in the knowledge that Jesus Christ is the savior of the world.  We live each moment in vital union with the Father and Son in by and through the Spirit.  Like our Elder Brother, we know that we can of ourselves do nothing and so we do only those things we see The Father doing and we speak only those words we hear The Father speaking.

It is a heartbreaking truth that many believers have chosen to wear another helmet and wield another sword.  They do not declare the truth God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself not imputing their trespasses to them nor do they speak the word (logos) of reconciliation.  They do not listen for nor wait for the utterances of God but go rushing forth with swords forged from carnal interpretation forgetting the letter kills and it is the Spirit who gives life.

There is a way that seems right but its end is the way of death.  Jesus Christ is THE WAY and He is the only way wherein there is life.  Let us refuse the counterfeit armor of God and instead allow the Holy Spirit to guide us into all truth.  May we listen for His voice alone and may grow more and more each day in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ.  May we dechomai only those things that are of Him and from Him.

To Him be the glory both now and forever!

Amen

Unless noted otherwise, all Scriptures are quoted from The Holy Bible, New King James Version, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee, 1982

References

Danker, Frederick William, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, Third Edition (BDAG), The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1957, 2000

Gurnall, William, The Christian in Complete Armour, Volume 1, Seventh Printing, Hendrickson Publishers, Peabody, Massachusetts, 2021

Murray, Andrew, With Christ in the School of Prayer, Wilder Publications, Radford, Virginia, 2008

Strong, James, LL.D., S.T.D., The New Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville Tennessee, 1990

A New Heart

07 Monday Dec 2020

Posted by in Gospel and Letters of John, Studies

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Conducting a word study on a passage is an undertaking most fascinating.  Sometimes, as I trace the words to their roots in the original language, a picture forms that makes the scripture leap off the page.  Other times, while the original meaning doesn’t reveal anything surprising, the words usage-or lack thereof-in other scriptures proves to be fascinating.  Such proved to be the case with my word study on Ezekiel 36: 25-27.

A quick recap: I decided on the word study when I was referred back to this passage by several different sources I used in my study of John chapter 3.  I found it fascinating that both the sources that assured me that the “born of water” in John 3:5 did mean water baptism as well as those that assured me it did not referenced me back to Ezekiel 36.  I decided to see for myself.

I do try not to undertake any study with preconceived ideas as to the meaning of scripture.  This is not easy as I have been a Christian all of my life and still find I carry ideas picked up from my church going days that are based on a doctrinal tradition rather than scripture.  The Holy Spirit is steadily rooting those out but, during this study, I caught myself mentally linking scriptures together that do not necessarily mean what I think they mean.

What do I mean?

It’s probably obvious by now that I do lean towards the interpretation that “born of water” does not mean water baptism but does, rather, mean an inward working of Jesus through the Holy Spirit.  (See last week’s post)  My study of Ezekiel 36: 25-27 seemed to bear this out.  God does say He “will sprinkle clean water” and “will cleanse you from all your filthiness and from all your idols.”  Despite this, I do think it’s a stretch to infer water baptism from this passage and even more of a stretch to think Jesus would have expected Nicodemus to make the association.  There is no mention of the ritual cleansing established in the law in all of chapter 36. The cleansing mentioned in my study scriptures is an intention of God and comes from the hand of God.  Verse 22 states “I do not do this for your sake, O house of Israel, but for My holy name’s sake…” John’s baptism was to the repentance of sins and I intend to go into this in more depth next week.  Suffice for this post, the Greek word translated repentance is metanoia (G3341) and means a change of mind1.  Important, necessary, but I do not see how such a baptism is synonymous with Jesus’s expounding on what it means to be born anew in John 3:5.  I am becoming convinced such a thing is a work of God inside of us rather than an outward immersion in water and these verses in Ezekiel seem to make this clear. However, I am not interested in bending scripture to support my own conviction:  I want to know the truth and am open to my word study showing me otherwise.

It didn’t do so. Verse 26 states “I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you.”  Here I find that same dual action of God described in John 3:5.  I was so excited!  “I get it!” I exclaimed to myself and my mind was flooded with other scriptures.  This is what metanoia must look like because Proverbs 23:7 says “as he thinks in his heart so is he” so this change in heart would of course result in a change of mind.  And then, thought I, Matthew 5:1 says “blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God” and I just bet that “See God” in this passage is the same as “See the Kingdom of God” in John 3:5. 

I do not wish to get into an argument over translations of the Bible, i.e. which is better/more accurate/most useful.  What I do wish to say here is that, just because a translator used the same English words in different passages, does not mean they are the same words in the original languages.  The words translated “see” in these two passages in the King James Version are not the same in the Greek.  The Hebrew word translated “heart” in my study scriptures is not the same as the Hebrew word translated “heart” in Proverbs 23:7.  Does this mean I am wrong in my assumptions?  Not necessarily.  What it does mean is that there are layers of meanings in these scriptures not immediately evident when I read them in English and are thus worthy of more study.  It also shows me how important it is to lay aside all my preconceived notions and focus only on what’s in the text.  It is supremely exciting to see that there is something new to discover.  Word studies do feel a bit like unearthing buried treasure.

And so, what treasures did I find in Ezekiel 36: 25-27?  As I conducted my study, I couldn’t help verses from Psalm 51 from coming to mind.  On a whim, I took a look at the words for “clean”, “heart”, and “spirit” in Psalm 51:10 and compared them to the same words in Ezekiel.  They were, each one, the same Hebrew.  Perhaps such a thing ought to be obvious but, since I found other Hebrew words translated “clean”, “heart”, and even “spirit” in other passages, I thought it best to verify. 

Do you know Psalm 51:10?  “Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me.”  This is a cry of David’s heart after the fiasco with Bathsheba.  It has been the cry of my heart many times.  As my study unfolded, it seemed to me that the promise of God in Ezekiel 36 was in answer to David’s plea in Psalm 51.  David cries out for a clean heart and right spirit and God promises a new heart and spirit.  Indeed, He promises His spirit (verse 27).

That’s all well and good, I imagine some of you saying, but what does that have to do with the material point?  Not a thing.  Nothing in this study led me to the conviction that these verses in Ezekiel ought to have suggested the water baptism being performed by John to the mind of Nicodemus. Still, I find I cannot unequivocally say that “born of water” in John 3:5 does not mean baptism.  There is still study I need to perform.

To be continued…

  1. Vine, W.E., Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Old & New Testament Words, 1997, Nashville, Tennessee, Thomas Nelson, Inc., 952.  

Back to Part Three

Continue to Part Five

The Grammar of Complexity

30 Monday Nov 2020

Posted by in Gospel and Letters of John, Studies

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

In last week’s post I one, mentioned my study of John 3:5 was pointing me to Ezekiel chapter 36: 25-27 and two, I quoted the commentary for John 3:5 from The Jewish Study Bible.  I am currently doing a word study on Ezekiel 36.  I am taking notes and also noting ideas I hope to share in later posts.  For this week, I wish to address hendiadys. 

The last sentence of The Jewish Study Bible’s commentary on John 3:5 says “…the grammatical construction (hendiadys) indicates that “water“ is a descriptor of the Spirit, as in Ezekiel 36:25-27”1.  I had to look up hendiadys.  I shared a link to the definition in last week’s post but am including it here from dictionary.com:  hendiadys =  a figure in which a complex idea is expressed by two words connected by a copulative conjunction: “to look with eyes and envy” instead of “with envious eyes.”  That must mean then that being born of water and the spirit are one and the same thing and no inference to baptism can be made.   

And yet the commentary by Dr. Vincent states that “We are not to understand with Calvin, the Holy Spirit as the purifying water in the spiritual sense: ‘water which is the spirit’”2.  Dr. Vincent then goes on to make his case for water baptism, portions of which I’ve quoted before.  I cannot speak with any authority on the beliefs of Calvin.  I’ve got books on religion on my shelves which I’ve had time to do little more than peruse and thus know little more than the broad strokes of Calvin’s beliefs.  And so–for the sake of argument and this post, I set all these authorities aside and am supposing that being born of water does NOT mean water baptism and instead seek to know if the grammatical structure IS saying that born of water and the spirit expresses a single complex idea. 

Bear with me…

The commentary on John 3:5 in The Passion Translation says that the water in John 3:6 is “the water of the Word of God that cleanses and gives us life” and directs me to Ephesians 5: 25 and 26, James 1:18, and 1 Peter 1:23.  Ephesians 5:26 does indeed say “that He might sanctify and cleanse her (the Church) with the washing of water by the word.  James 1:18 says “Of His own will He brought us forth by the word of truth, that we might be a kind of first-fruits of His creatures”. 

J. Preston Eby quotes 1 Peter 1:23 in his teaching on John 3:5:  “Scripture abounds in figures, and Jesus always spoke in symbolic terms.  When He said, “Except ye eat my flesh and drink my blood, ye have no life in you,” He certainly was not advocating cannibalism!  He was using a natural figure to illustrate a spiritual truth.  So when He says one must be “born of water” do not understand water to mean what we are accustomed to think of as the natural water that men drink or wash in.  It is a figure of THE LIVING WORD OF GOD.  New birth ever, and only, is by the Word of God and by the Spirit of God.  These are the only two agents directly involved in the new birth throughout the scriptures.  “Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever” (I Pet. 1:23).  Some have thought the water to mean baptism.  But there is no mention of baptism in chapter three of John, nor is baptism ever connected anywhere in the New Testament with the new birth. A man can no more be born again by coming up out of natural water than he can be born again by entering the second time into his mother’s womb.  Both are physical, natural, earthly, temporal and corruptible things.  They are not agents of the spiritual world at all.” The Kingdom of God-Part 6

In the first post of this series, I listed scriptures used for reference by Dr. Vincent; namely Psalms 51:2&7, Ezekiel 36:25, and Zechariah 13:14.  Zechariah 13:1 says, “In that day a fountain shall be opened for the house of David and for the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for sin and for uncleanness.”  When I quoted this in the first post, I remembered the story of the woman at the well told in the 4th chapter of John’s Gospel where Jesus said to her, “If you had only known and had recognized God’s gift and Who this is saying to you, Give Me a drink, you would have asked Him [instead] and He would have given you living water”. Jesus says in verse 14: “But the water that I will give him shall become a spring of water welling up (flowing, bubbling) [continually] within him unto (into, for) eternal life” and then in Chapter 7 verses 38 and 39: “’He who believes in Me [who cleaves to and trusts in and relies on Me] as the Scripture has said, From his innermost being shall flow [continuously] springs and rivers of living water’. But He was speaking here of the Spirit…” (Amplified)

Does being born of water mean being born of the living word of God? If so, are they separate but equal agents? Does born of water mean the living water that Jesus gives which is the spirit? Am I failing to grasp a concept which is, really, quite simple?

My confusion clears when I consider John 14:16 which says: “And I will ask the Father and He will give you another Comforter…”  The Greek word for another is this passage is allos (G243). Vine’s Expository Dictionary says there are two words for “another” in the Greek: allos and heteros.  “ALLOS and HETEROS have a difference in meaning, which despite a tendency to be lost, is to be observed in numerous passages.  Allos expresses a numerical difference and denotes another of the same sort: heteros expresses a qualitative difference and denotes another of a different sort.  Christ promised to send “another Comforter” (allos, another like Himself…)”5

Perhaps the grammatical structure of John 3:5 is expressing something that can that only be understood by the Spirit and that is the very being of God. Father, Son, Spirit: They are Three and They are One. Hendiadys.

To be continued… 

Some extra study links:

Living Water

  1. The Complete Jewish Study Bible, 2016, Peabody Massachusetts, Hendrickson Publishers Marketing LLC, Gospel of John, Commentary, 3:5, Page 1524
  2. Vincent, Marvin R., D.D., Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament Volume II, Peabody, Massachusetts, Hendrickson Publishers, Gospel of John, 5. Born of Water and the Spirit, Page 91
  3. https://www.godfire.net/eby/Kingdom6.html   
  4. Vincent, Marvin R., D.D., Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament Volume II, Peabody Massachusetts, Hendrickson Publishers, Gospel of John Chapter 3:5. Born of Water and the Spirit, Page 91
  5. Vine, W.E., Vine’s Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, 1997, Nashville, Tennessee, Thomas Nelson, Inc., Another, Page 52

Back to Part Two

Continue to Part Four